This one started off slow, but after about fifty pages, I was captivated. I believe the reason the beginning was slow was because it basically just went over everything that happened it the last book. However, once the story got going, I couldn't put the book down. I thought this one was a lot better than the first, and it'll be great if the series keeps getting better. I really enjoy the idea of these books. I can’t stand, however, the authors' tendency to re-tell the reader all of what happened in the previous books. I mean, who is reading book 2 without having read the other book? Do we really have to get the Cherokee translation for daughter again?
Zoey, the heroine I praised in the last book for being a good role model, seems to use these words a lot to describe one particular girl who she happened to catch once in a slightly compromising position in the first book. It's a really emotional book, and deals with a wide range of themes including death, and as the title suggests, betrayal. The loyalty among Zoey's group never falters though, and it really strengthens the book. Yet, Zoey is confused over not one, not two, but three guys in this book. Does that make her a slut?
1. Her uber-cute human ex-boyfriend Heath whose - I quote - bulge in the pants she finds herself rubbing.
2. Her fellow vampire and uber-handsome current boyfriend Erik (Ohmydearsweetlord) whom the entire school considers to be her boyfriend but she is not really sure because even though they've dated a few times and kissed and hugged and held hands, they haven’t proceeded any further…
3. And the uber-sexy adult vampire poet and school professor Loren (no words are enough, just fan yourself here) with whom she flirts a couple of times.
Her arch nemesis, Aphrodite, who used to date Erik at some point and had been caught performing a dirty act with him in a dark corner of the school corridor, is under no circumstances to be confused with Zoey, because Zoey is not - I quote - a stank slut like Aphrodite the Ho.
-Tanya
I think that we throw around those terms to label women (young and old) too much, and do you think the author is making a statement about that?
ReplyDelete